Selasa, 05 September 2017

Lego Hits Brick Wall With Sales, Sheds 8% of Global Workforce


The Lego headquarters in Billund, Denmark. The toymaker’s growth has slowed since 2015.
The Lego headquarters in Billund, Denmark. The toymaker’s growth has slowed since 2015. PHOTO:FABIAN BIMMER/REUTERS
  • The maker of Legos, long immune to the struggles weighing on other toy companies, reported its first sales drop in 13 years on Tuesday, betraying cracks in its strategy to compete against a rising array of digital distractions for children.
    Lego AS, the Danish company built on a foundation of tiny plastic blocks, said it would lay off 8% of its workers and thin the ranks of decision makers to speed up product rollouts.
    “The car has gone off the road and landed in a ditch and now we have to pull it out and get it back up to speed again,” said Jørgen Vig Knudstorp, chairman of Lego Brand Group, in an interview.
    In some ways, the sales drop is a result of Lego’s own success.
    Its current structure was created to cope with double-digit sales growth, but the company says it now has too many layers and overlapping business functions, making it tougher to implement marketing strategies, slower to react to trends and disconnected from retailers.
    “We have built an increasingly complex organization, an organization that is complex to a degree that makes it difficult for us to realize the growth potential we have,” said Mr. Knudstorp, who served as Lego’s CEO until the end of last year.
    To turn sales around, Lego last month named Niels B. Christiansen, the 51-year-old former boss of Danish industrial group Danfoss AS, as its new CEO, succeeding Bali Padda, a Lego executive for 15 years who had been its chief operating officer before taking the CEO job.
    Like Mattel Inc. MAT -1.64% and other toy makers, Lego is being buffeted by a host of new rivals for children’s attention, including playing videogames and watching YouTube videos. In response, the industry has tried to modernize toys for the digital age: Lego has rolled out its own videogames based on its plastic bricks as well as a set of programmable robots.
    The shift, however, hasn’t come fast enough to counter eroding sales of more traditional toy lines. Lego said Tuesday its overall sales for the six months to June 30 fell 5% from a year earlier. In July, Mattel said its half-year sales fell 6.4%.
    One bright spot for Lego: Tuesday’s half-year sales of 14.9 billion Danish kroner ($2.38 billion) pushed it above rival Mattel, which in July reported half-year sales of $1.71 billion. Sales were above the $1.82 billion Hasbro reported for its first half. But Lego’s net profit has slipped to 3.4 billion kroner from 3.5 billion kroner a year earlier.
    Meanwhile, Mattel has cut its dividend to free up cash and revitalize its approach to toy development. Newly installed Chief Executive Margo Georgiadis, a former Google executive, said the U.S. company needed “to adapt” to the modern world. She said she wanted all of Mattel’s key brands, like Barbie and Hot Wheels, to include not just physical toys, but also video content and gaming components.
    Lego has in some ways been ahead of the curve in efforts to experiment digitally, even as it has promised to remain committed to its physical brick sets. Following the launch of its Chima toy line in 2013, for instance, it introduced related online games, videos and a TV series. It has created Lego Boost, a robot-building kit that combines computer coding with elements of physical construction. And in February, the company launched an app-based social network—promising strict moderation and privacy controls—that lets children share their Lego creations.
    Digital offerings aren’t threatening to wipe out physical toys anytime soon. Kids “are still reading books, still using Legos, people are making a place for physical toys,” said Judy Ishayik, owner of Mary Arnold Toys, an independent toy shop in Manhattan. But, she said, “there’s more dual play,” where physical toys are paired with a digital component.
    She pointed to Crayola, owned by Hallmark Cards Inc., which rolled out an app that turns coloring-book creations into animated online representations. Hasbro Inc.’s Love2Learn Elmo app provides children with a way of interacting verbally with their Elmo dolls.
    Play on touch-screen devices outranks all other kinds of play in frequency—including with blocks, board games and puzzles—according to a 2014 survey by New York research firm Michael Cohen Group of 350 parents with children age 12 and under.
    The shift underscores the challenge for Mr. Christiansen, who takes the reins next month. In his nine years heading Danfoss, Mr. Christiansen is credited with making operations more efficient and agile, and investing in research and development as well as digital capabilities. At Lego, he takes over from Mr. Padda, who will have been in the job just nine months.
    On Tuesday, Lego said it would cut roughly 1,400 jobs, with between 500 to 600 of these coming from its Billund, Denmark, headquarters alone. It is also working to reduce layers of management and administration to speed product rollout, which Mr. Knudstorp said can involve 20 teams on average before a product is ready for global launch.
    “We are simply not executing well enough on our activities across the business, on product development, marketing, sales,” said Mr. Knudstorp, who as chairman of Lego Brand Group oversees the Kirk Kristiansen family’s 75% stake in Lego, as well as its interests in Legoland theme parks and an education business.
    It could be a couple of years before the changes yield results, warned Mr. Knudstorp while declining to specify whether he expects Lego to return to sales growth this year or even next. Lego previously said a big marketing push in the U.S. had failed to pay off, and on Tuesday said its U.S. sales had declined in the first half.
    Lego’s results sent tremors through the toy industry. Shares of Mattel were down 1.5% and Hasbro stock was off nearly 3% in New York.
    Some of Lego’s recent woes are because toys tied to movies have underperformed retailers’ and manufacturers’ expectations. Lego products tied to last year’s “Star Wars” movie, “Rogue One,” didn’t generate the same excitement as had the prior installment, “The Force Awakens,” which was the first “Star Wars” movie in a decade.
    SOURCE: THE COMPANY
    Another big bet that didn’t fully deliver: the company’s second movie based on its toys, called “Lego Batman.”
    Toys “R” Us Inc. said toys tied to the movie missed sales goals, even though Lego spent heavily to try to boost interest. “It didn’t manifest itself into the kind of sales momentum that we expected or they expected,” Toys “R” Us CEO David Brandon said in June.
    Mr. Knudstorp, who served as CEO from 2004 until the end of 2016, acknowledged his share of the blame for the recent troubles.
    A former kindergarten teacher and McKinsey consultant, Mr. Knudstorp was the first person outside Lego’s controlling family to lead the company. He took over after Lego sales had slowed sharply and heavy debt threatened bankruptcy.
    He refocused the company on its iconic brick sets, and scaled back on the array of watches, clothing, dolls and other merchandise the company had rolled out. Initially, he also cut jobs, outsourced manufacturing and simplified the management structure. All that buoyed sales, giving Lego double-digit growth for more than a decade.
    More recently, though, he boosted staff to keep up with resurgent demand—and the expectation that it would continue to boom. Between 2012 and 2016, Lego added 7,000 new employees.
    “This investment has not materialized into a good harvest,” he said. “We have clearly built too large an organization and we need to make it smaller.”
    Source : WSJ

    Selasa, 22 Agustus 2017

    Chevron CEO John Watson to Step Down

    Chevron Corp. Chief Executive John Watson is planning to step down as the energy giant seeks new leadership for a changing oil world, according to people familiar with the matter.
    The transition is expected to be announced next month, although Mr. Watson’s successor hasn’t yet been finalized by the board and plans could change, the people said. Mr. Watson isn’t expected to depart immediately and is likely to remain after the announcement for an orderly transition, the people said.
    His likely departure underscores the dramatic shift under way at big oil companies as they adapt to a prolonged period of lower prices brought about by the U.S. shale boom. While the companies once favored swashbuckling leaders who bet billions on megamergers and pricey projects in far-flung regions, many are now turning to executives adept at squeezing every last dollar from a barrel through refining, and shorter-term investments that turn a profit faster.
    The leading candidate to succeed Mr. Watson, 60, is Michael Wirth, 56, a refining specialist who earlier this year was elevated to the position of vice chairman at the oil company, the second largest in the U.S. behind Exxon MobilCorp. , the people said.
    Chevron directors see Mr. Wirth’s years of experience wringing costs out of big plants that process fuel and chemicals as a critical need in a new era for oil markets defined by $50-a-barrel crude, the people said.

    From the Archives

    Chevron's John Watson on the Price of Oil
    Chevron CEO John Watson shares his thoughts on the price of oil and where it’s headed, in a discussion with WSJ’s financial editor Dennis Berman at a WSJ Viewpoints breakfast event. (Originally published May 18, 2016)

    From the Archives

    Chevron's John Watson on the Morality of Oil
    Chevron CEO John Watson shares his thoughts on public perception of the environmental impact of oil production. He spoke with WSJ’s Dennis Berman at a Viewpoints breakfast event. (Originally published May 18, 2016)
    A Chevron spokesman declined to comment. Attempts to reach Mr. Watson on Tuesday weren’t successful.
    Mr. Wirth’s ascent would mean four of the five largest public energy companies—including Exxon, Royal Dutch Shell PLC and Total SA —would be led by former refining specialists, a telling indication of transformation in oil markets. BPPLC’s Bob Dudley would be the last holdover from the time of $100-a-barrel crude.
    The executive ranks have turned over at most big oil companies in the last four years. Former Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson retired to become the U.S. Secretary of State. Christophe de Margerie, the former CEO of France’s Total, died in a 2014 accident in Moscow. Shell’s leader Peter Voser retired at the end of 2013. All were replaced by former refining executives.
    The expected retirement of Mr. Watson, who has led Chevron since 2010, is taking place on amicable terms: He decided to step down well before Chevron’s mandatory retirement age of 65 years for executives to allow some of the company’s new leaders to flourish, the people said. His planned departure comes within the period that he had long outlined to the board, they added. Mr. Watson’s predecessor as chief executive, David O’Reilly, also retired years before turning 65.
    “Big oil is turning toward very disciplined, returns-centric leaders who can manage razor-thin margins in disruptive, volatile markets,” said Les Csorba, who advises energy companies on CEO succession at executive search firmHeidrick & Struggles International , and wasn’t involved in Mr. Watson’s succession. “This is the answer for these companies as low prices continue.”In Mr. Watson’s seven-and-a-half years at the helm, Chevron’s shareholder returns—which include dividends—have increased by more than 80%. That performance has far outstripped that of peers such as Exxon and Shell in that time period, although it fell short of the advance by the S&P 500 index. He previously played a major role in managing Chevron’s absorption of Texaco Inc. in 2000 and served as the company’s chief financial officer. Mr. Watson’s tenure was defined by spending on an epic scale to build out projects all over the world as oil prices ballooned, including some in which costs far exceeded initial projections.
    In Australia, two mammoth gas-export projects cost Chevron and its partners almost $90 billion, or $23 billion higher than initial projections, according to analyst estimates.
    That spending was a sore spot for some investors, the people said, although many analysts over the years have come to see the projects in a favorable light because of how much cash they are expected to generate. Last year, investors came close to rejecting Mr. Watson’s compensation in a “say on pay” advisory vote. His overall compensation, including stock awards and pension changes, was $24.6 million in 2016, according to company filings.
    Although the compensation measure ultimately passed with more than 50% of the vote, company officials and directors made an effort to meet with investors about their concerns and make changes.
    After a number of pay reforms, including a provision that holds executives accountable for cost overruns, Chevron’s executive-compensation package for this year won the support of more than 93% of shareholders who cast ballots at its annual meeting in May.
    Among major oil companies, Chevron also has by far the biggest position in the Permian basin in West Texas and New Mexico, among the busiest and most sought-after oil fields in the world.
    Under Mr. Watson and production chief Jay Johnson, Chevron has moved to exploit the resource at a breakneck pace, a strategy that has been lauded by analysts.
    The company’s land in the Permian may hold as much as 18 billion barrels of oil and gas, according to Houston energy investment bank Tudor Pickering Holt & Co.
    Some had pushed Chevron to ramp up drilling sooner, but the company proceeded at a deliberate pace, seeking partners in an effort to understand how to maximize returns.
    Mr. Watson, who earned a master’s in business administration at the University of Chicago business school, is a fan of free-market economist Milton Friedman and an unabashed believer in the importance of oil and gas in the world economy.
    In interviews, he has extolled the virtues of cheap energy in alleviating poverty as more people around the world enter middle class. He has also expressed concerns about far-reaching interventions by governments to reduce warming temperatures, often making note of the potential costs to societies. His views on climate change aren’t believed to have played any role in his plans to step down, the people familiar with the matter said.
    Mr. Wirth, a Chevron employee since 1982, is said to have views on climate change that are more in sync with those expressed by peers at Exxon, whose chief executive, Darren Woods, urged President Donald Trump not to withdraw from the Paris climate accords. The U.S. in June said it would withdraw from the accord.
    Mr. Wirth oversaw the company’s refining and chemicals businesses for about a decade, ending in 2016. Since 2015, profit from that business unit have far outstripped any other operations even amid the price crash. It has booked more than $13 billion in profit in the last 10 quarters, even as the drilling and production business lost more than $2 billion.
    Source : WSJ

    Minggu, 09 Juli 2017

    The Angst of Endangered CEOs: ‘How Much Time Do I Have?’

    The bosses of America’s biggest and best-known companies are learning a common lesson this year: The pay is great, but job security has rarely been shakier.
    In June alone, the chief executives of General Electric Co., Uber Technologies Inc., Whirlpool Corp. WHR 1.27% Buffalo Wild Wings Inc., BWLD -1.15%Perrigo Co. PRGO 0.19% and Pandora Media Inc. -1.50% resigned or announced their departures. Among those, only Whirlpool’s Jeff Fettig didn’t have to confront investor pressure in the months before announcing he will step down.
    Their exits follow an especially busy season of upheaval in corner offices. In the first five months of 2017, 13 companies with market values of more than $40 billion installed new CEOs—including American International Group Inc.,AIG 0.43% Ford Motor Co. 0.72% , and Caterpillar Inc. CAT 0.38% —according to an analysis for The Wall Street Journal by executive-recruitment firm Crist/Kolder Associates. That is more than double the CEO changes at mega-corporations in the same period last year.
    This chief executive churn reflects a broader reality for the country’s business elite: An array of challenges—from increasing impatience on Wall Street and in boardrooms to a corporate landscape rapidly transformed by new technologies and rival upstarts—has made the top job tougher and more precarious than just a few years ago, top executives say. Even the biggest companies are vulnerable to shareholder disapproval and competitive forces that their size and stature once helped them fend off.
    The typical CEO of a major company a decade ago resembled a ship captain “who could rally a group of people with a lot of process and procedures,” said Deborah Rubin, a senior partner at RHR International, a leadership-development firm. “Today’s CEO has to be much more like a race car driver,” she added. “You have to do the sharp maneuvers.”
    Flush with more cash than ever, activist investors are pursuing bigger corporate prey. This year, they have helped push out the leaders of AIG, railroad operator CSX Corp. and aluminum-parts manufacturer Arconic Inc.Indeed, one-third of the 42 S&P 500 and Fortune 500 companies that replaced a CEO through May this year grappled with the demands of activist shareholders during the prior chief’s tenure, Crist/Kolder’s analysis found.
    Through June 23, activists had launched nine campaigns targeting top management at U.S. companies this year—and the fastest pace since 2014, according to FactSet, a research firm.

    Even GE CEO Jeff Immelt’s disclosure that he would depart this summer came amid brewing tensions with activist investor Nelson Peltz over the conglomerate’s languishing stock price.
    Though the move was part of a long-in-the-works transition, Mr. Peltz’s Trian Fund Management LP had recently stepped up pressure on GE to cut costs more aggressively and boost profits, setting off speculation about when the longtime CEO might leave.
    Mr. Immelt said he decided in 2013 that he would step aside sometime this year after 16 years at the helm, and GE board officials have said Trian played no role in the leadership change. “My predecessor did it for 20 years—it’s not a 20-year job today,” the 61-year-old Mr. Immelt said last week at the Aspen Ideas Festival in Colorado.
    Growing shareholder clamor for quick results comes as new technologies are upending entire industries. If you run a retailer, for instance, “you are watching your whole market go away in just a matter of years,” said Peter D. Crist, chairman of Crist/Kolder.
    J. Crew Group Inc. and Macy’s Inc.,two such retailers that have struggled to adapt to consumer shifts created by online shopping and upstarts with more nimble supply chains, have recently appointed new CEOs. Both of their predecessors, Mickey Drexler at J. Crew and Terry Lundgren at Macy’s, are remaining chairmen of their companies.
    Likewise, Ford’s ouster of Mark Fields after less than three years in its highest job was the starkest sign yet of how tech players such as electric-car maker Tesla Inc. andAlphabet Inc.’s autonomous-car unit, Waymo, threaten the traditional auto sector. Mr. Fields had been groomed for years to take Ford’s helm, but his fellow board members swiftly replaced him after he failed to persuade Wall Street he was reinventing the car maker quickly enough. Ford said Mr. Fields, who retires in August, wasn’t available for comment.
    “That’s just not enough time to do that kind of job” required at Ford, said Bill George, former chief executive of Medtronic PLC who is now a professor at Harvard Business School. Some CEOs Mr. George speaks with, he said, are asking themselves “How much time do I have?”
    Corporate boards increasingly reply: Not much.
    “In boardrooms, sentimentality is officially dead,” said Constantine Alexandrakis, head of the U.S. for recruiting firm Russell Reynolds Associates Inc.
    Such pressures aren’t just forcing boards to jettison CEOs. Donald Hambrick, a professor of management at Penn State University’s Smeal College of Business, said he suspected some corporate chiefs are voluntarily hastening their retirements.
    Roland Smith, hired to run struggling Office Depot Inc. in November 2013, retired earlier this year after saying he had always planned to do so after three years. His tenure at the office-supplies retailer marked the fifth CEO stint for the 62-year-old turnaround specialist—and one of his toughest.
    Mr. Smith’s latest challenge? A 13,000-mile motorcycle trip with his son from Key West, Fla., to Alaska and then Jackson Hole, Wyo. “I am in total control of everything I do on the (motorcycle) ride,’’ Mr. Smith said from the road last week. “As the CEO, you only are in control of a small proportion that happens.’’
    Source : WSJ