Minggu, 23 Oktober 2016

Carlos Ghosn stakes his reputation on Mitsubishi

Even for Carlos Ghosn, the man dubbed “le cost killer” after overhauling Renaultand saving Nissan from near collapse, leading three companies could be a dangerously bold stretch.
The 62-year-old chief executive of Nissan and Renault is putting his own reputation on the line by agreeing to become chairman of lossmaking Mitsubishi Motors.
Mitsubishi formally joined the Renault-Nissan alliance on Thursday via a $2.3bn capital injection, in a move that means the enlarged group should be right behind Toyota, Volkswagen and General Motors in terms of number of cars sold each year. 
“With 10m cars, we have a handicap to nobody and we have an advantage on most,” said Mr Ghosn at a media briefing in Tokyo.
In order to devote enough time to reviving Mitsubishi, which was engulfed in scandal in April after admitting to cheating on its vehicles’ fuel economy data, Mr Ghosn will for the first time share the role of Nissan top manager with a colleague. 
Becoming Mitsubishi chairman is “a confident move but a big gamble for Mr Ghosn”, says Tosh Kojima, managing director at DC Advisory, a corporate finance adviser. “If things go wrong, it will definitely tarnish his otherwise fabulous reputation and godlike status not just in the industry but in Japan as a whole.”
Analysts say Nissan’s purchase of a 34 per cent stake in Mitsubishi for $2.3bn is as much about ensuring the survival of the Franco-Japanese alliance in a new era of technology competition as it is about a bailout of a smaller rival.
“It looks like Mr Ghosn rescued Mitsubishi,” says Takaki Nakanishi, a former Merrill Lynch analyst who now runs his own research group. “But having Mitsubishi’s platform will make it easier for Renault and Nissan to draw its next phase of growth strategy.”
The partnership between Nissan and Mitsubishi, makers of the Leaf and i-MiEV electric vehicles respectively, will give them the scale to cut costs amid the rapid rise of Tesla, the new industry entrant that has made a name for itself by manufacturing sophisticated battery-powered cars. 
The new alliance will generate ¥24bn ($231m) in cost savings and other benefits in 2017-18 and ¥60bn in the following fiscal year, said Mr Ghosn. 
In spite of depressed car sales in Japan due to several safety scandals dating back to 2000, Mitsubishi has maintained a loyal customer base in Southeast Asia, which would help address Nissan’s weakness in the region.
The Nissan Leaf
Mitsubishi also has a global manufacturing hub in Thailand from where its pick-up trucks are now exported to the Middle East, Africa and Latin America.
“Obviously we are not happy with our performance in [the Association of Southeast Asian Nations],” said Mr Ghosn. ‘This is where the synergy is working the other way, where Mitsubishi can deliver a lot of good examples and benchmark for Nissan to perform better.” 
Meanwhile, the promotion of Hiroto Saikawa, Nissan’s chief competitive officer, to the role of co-chief executive will give Mr Ghosn some space to focus on Mitsubishi’s turnround.
Mitsubishi will probably need to carry out painful restructuring in Japan, according to Mr Nakanishi, to rebound from expected net losses of ¥240bn in 2016-17.
In the case of Nissan, Mr Ghosn closed five Japanese factories, axed 21,000 jobs worldwide and halved the number of parts suppliers after joining the company as chief operating officer in 1999 following three years at Renault. 
Mr Ghosn stressed his chairman role at Mitsubishi will focus on ensuring strong corporate governance, including support to Osamu Masuko, who has been asked to stay on as chief executive. “I have no intention to interfere with the management of Mitsubishi,” he said.
Mitsubishi Motors' chief executive Osamu Masuko © EPA
His new responsibilities at Mitsubishi also come at a time of fraught relations between Mr Ghosn and the French government, which commands about 20 per cent of voting rights at Renault. The state voted in April against Mr Ghosn’s pay package at Renault, which wields effective control over Nissan through a 43 per cent stake.
Still, a Renault investor based in Paris is optimistic about Mr Ghosn’s additional responsibilities. “Ghosn can probably handle another role,” says the shareholder. “That man is a machine.” 
A deeper uncertainty for investors is whether the alliance led by Mr Ghosn can thrive in the new age of electrification and self-driving cars, particularly given technology groups including Google are working on vehicles. 
“Like it or not, Carlos Ghosn’s competition is not Toyota but the likes of Tesla and Google,” says Mr Kojima. “Buying Mitsubishi Motors is not going to help them on this front.” 
Source : FT

Minggu, 02 Oktober 2016

Coach, in Turnaround Mode, Reports Sales Growth

Coach Inc. reported strong demand for higher-priced handbags at its retail stores and said it would slash its business with department stores, as the fashion company works to wean customers off discounts.
Sales at the handbag maker’s existing North American stores grew for the first time in more than three years in its latest quarter, evidence that the company’s turnaround is starting to take hold.
Coach Chief Executive Victor Luis told analysts on Tuesday that the results “capped a year where we returned the Coach brand to growth while elevating brand perception.” He predicted sales would continue to improve in the current fiscal year even as the company reduces sales to retail chains.
The company plans to pull out of 250 department stores in the current fiscal year, which would reduce its distribution in the channel by about 25%. It is also reducing the amount of money it provides department stores to cover the cost of discounts, which would exclude the brand from certain storewide promotions. The move will hurt the company’s operating margin, with most of the effect felt in the first quarter.
“This is very much a surgical move that is meant to drive the long-term sustainable health of our brand,” Mr. Luis said, adding that he wants to avoid confusing shoppers who see Coach items selling for higher prices at its retail stores than at department stores.
Coach has upgraded its handbags and accessories with better quality and more fashion, while curtailing discounts—efforts that have helped it stem a long sales decline in the Coach brand in its home market, where sales at existing stores increased 2% in the three months to July 2.
The company still faces challenges, including sluggish growth in overall handbag sales, continued competition from Michael Kors Holdings Ltd. and other rivals and intense discounting across the retail landscape. Last week,Kate Spade & Co. shares tumbled after the company slashed its financial forecasts for the year. Kors reports results on Wednesday.
Investors who had bid Coach stock up 25% since the start of the year had been looking for even stronger growth. Coach shares slipped 50 cents to $40.95 in early afternoon trading.
North America outlet stores, which have been hurt by a pullback in tourist spending, pose another challenge. Sales at existing Coach outlet stores were flat in the period, and the company isn’t expecting sales to increase materially for the balance of the year.
The company remodeled 300 stores in its recently completed fiscal year, bringing total remodels to 450 world-wide.
It is also rolling out its high-end 1941 line, with handbags that can sell for as much as $800, to all of its Coach stores as its seeks to appeal to more affluent shoppers. Handbags and accessories priced over $400 accounted for 40% of is sales in the quarter, up from 30% a year ago.
Quarterly sales rose 15% to $1.15 billion in the fourth quarter. Net income totaled $81.5 million, up from $11.7 million a year ago.
Coach said the Stuart Weitzman brand, which it acquired last year, had sales of $345 million for the year. Founder Stuart Weitzman will step down as creative director in May 2017, but will remain chairman. He will be succeeded byGiovanni Morelli, who has worked for Marc Jacobs, Chloe and Burberry.
Coach expects revenue for the current fiscal year to increase by roughly 2% to 5%. Operating margin should range from 18.5% to 19%, compared with 17.3% in the recently completed year.
Source : WSJ